i dont understand the tone in this peice. it does not move me, and the colors do not compliment the background. no originality, this is very much like every landscape i've ever seen. the technique is obviously reused an cliche. i suggest using lighter brush techniques.
the overall portrayal of the horse is not what was desired. there is a lack of lighting and the light source does not compliment what is reflected in the eyes. i can see you attempted to convey a sense of serenity, but it did not work, what with those tacky brush stokes and bland colorations.
thats a horse??
YOU... YOU THOUGHT IT.. IT SUCKKED/?
I MARKED THIS UNFAIR USELESSSS!
horsy its ok
U SUC SO BAID I GIV U CRIT U B MEN II TRY GIV HELP OMG ((((
DUNT JUDGE MEMEMEG!!!!!
I WIL CUM TO UR HOUSE
AND KEL U RITE THERE!
It's technically not useless dearie. Not all critique is going to be what you want to hear/see/read on the screen. I think it's quite fair to be honest. It's what she saw, and what you asked for. Just "for the record". Okay? She never said it "sucked" either. (Just for the record I spelled it correctly for you that time). Her critique is actually much more enlightening than your entire piece. *shrugs*
you you know that
im joking right
I felt like pointing things out from her comments. *shrugs* Take it up with her, not me. I'm an innocent lurker of the thing called internet.
WE'RE NOT BEING SERIOUS